All Saints Pasadena – Voices of Columbus

June 22, 2006

They saved the worst ’til last…

Filed under: Louise's Posts — by Moderator @ 9:29 am

Louise BrooksTv commercials taut a slogan about Las Vegas (the home of our Presiding Bishop Elect Katharine Jefferts Schori)… “what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas” and wouldn’t it be great if that were also true about Columbus. Unfortunately, what happened in Columbus yesterday will have an effect around the world. The railroading through the House of Bishops and then the House of Deputies of B033 – of a moratorium on the ordination of bishops whose ‘manner of life’ might cause offence to the wider church was a shocking series of events.

Beginning the day before, the HOD (House of Deputies) overwhelmingly defeated Resolution A161, commonly known as the “moratoria” clause. My gay brothers and sisters in Integrity and their straight allies were a well-oiled machine on the HOD floor as they rose to speak against this resolution. It was amazing to watch how well orchestrated the loyal opposition was. And while it looked like an effortless process, we know from all the late-night and early morning strategizing, that it was the product of years of hard work. That night as we all celebrated this church we love so much, a handful of bishops met to rewrite A161 to be proposed in the HOB the next day.

The next morning began with +Schori’s first sermon since her election. “Jesus calls us all to be friends, not agents of fear,” she preached. For those who like short sermons, this one lasted only about 10 minutes. But it was all down hill after that. A161 was introduced to the HOB as B033. While there was some language about engaging in reconciliation and a listening process, the basis of the resolution was to agree to a moratorium on the ordination of bishops whose ‘manner of life’ might cause offence to the wider church.

“This is stupid”, grumbled +Jon Bruno (who the LA Times claims voted for it). Bishop Mike Curry of North Carolina rose and gave an eloquent dissent. Bishops Chane and Andrus tried to propose an amendment. ++Griswold was furious. It was an incredible scene as he chastised his fellow bishops for wasting time. A flustered Andrus finally withdrew his amendment. Some called for a roll call vote. ++Griswold was once again furious. He did not want to waste time. Then he delivered his threat: If you do not pass this, we will not be invited to Lambeth in 2008. He denied that the Archbishop of Canterbury had specifically make that threat, but made it clear that he felt that was the case. Fear was rampant. ++Griswold had clearly become an agent of fear. Then +Schori rose and gave her ludricious “conjoined twins” analogy. (Ask Ed to speak about this at the upcoming forum on Sunday.)   It was the capper, or closer. The vote was taken. It passed. Railroaded through the HOB on a locomotive of FEAR. “Jesus calls us all to be friends, not agents of fear.”

It was almost lunchtime but what had just taken place in the HOB had ruined everyone’s appetite. We proceeded to the HOD, assuming that during the lunch break, meetings with our floor team would allow for a strategy to defeat B033. But we were barely into the room when we heard the President of the House introduce B033. Next thing we knew, it was announced that +Schori wanted to address the house. She gave the same inane speech that she had given the HOB….the “conjoined twins” who could not live apart at this particular time. In my opinion, +Schori now had become exactly what she had preached against a few hours earlier: an agent of fear.

Then a gay deputy, whom I was told earlier that morning, was one of the smartest deputies in the House, got up and emotionally said she would vote for it. The HOD fell like a house of cards. When confronted later, many of our own contingent confessed, “I did it because +Katherine asked us to.”  Like lemmings, they jumped off the cliff.  The resolution was passed by the HOD.

Shortly afterwards, the wife of the Rev. Canon Dr. Martin Minns, one of the AAC/ACN group, slipped Susan a noted which read “ The gays and lesbians in this church have been sold out for a tea party at Lambeth.”  Sadly, she’s right.

Katie Sherrod, an Integrity member and straight supporter who lives in Fort Worth, was devastated. She’s also a journalist and producer. We talked about the shocking behavior of our presiding bishop and she told me that just before the vote in the HOB, she was on her way to the bathroom when she stumbled upon ++Griswold and a few of his minions in the hall. ++Griswold was talking into a cell phone. Then +Schori joined the group. ++Griswold handed her the cell phone. Shortly thereafter, she stood up in the HOB and gave her “conjoined twins” speech. Who was on the other end of that cell phone? We can only speculate that it was “someone high up” in the communion giving orders to pass B033 or else.

Bishop Barbara Harris provided the only comic relief in what was a terrible day. “I wouldn’t go to Lambeth if Jesus himself were there giving out $1000 dollar bills.” She said, I went once before and “if assholes had wings, Lambeth would be an airport.”

What I don’t have to speculate about was the impact of B033.  It was like having your guts torn out. Last night, the troops rallied to support one another. Ed took a group of us to dinner. He was as angry and hurt as the rest of us. How lucky are we from ASC to be able to go back where none of this really matters, where we can be who we are and be accepted and celebrated.  But after dinner, I sat in a room full of volunteers and supporters, many of whom were still weeping from the acts of earlier in the day. Some were old warriors who questioned whether or not they still should be priests. Some were young volunteers…. seminarians or would be priests….who quietly cried what seemed to be endless tears. Some were too upset to stay and took to their beds.  We talked about leaving. We talked about staying and decided that was the better option.

We were sold out. We were used as the bargaining chip to get an invitation to Lambeth. I want all those who voted yes to look into the eyes of the gay and lesbian faithful…look long and hard and close…and see what you have done. It will take years to undo the harm. I hope it was worth the price. And as we ponder that question, we must remember another sermon we heard here at GC. It was preached by +Gene Robinson at the Integrity Eucharist….words that were more prophetic than any of us realized: “No matter what they say or what they do….you must” he implored, “you must love them anyway!”

12 Comments »

  1. Louise – I can hear the hurt and disappointment in your post.

    I too am disappointed and angry. My disappointment is not, however, directed at the PB, nor at the Convention, but at the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Windsor process which set this Convention up for this false choice that we were bound to have to make sooner or later.

    I also believe that we at All Saints must practice what we preach. Ed often says that we must not despair- that to do so invalidates our faith, because it says that we do not have trust that God is in control, that God- in the biggest picture- is moving things forward in God's time. We don't yet know what that time is, or how the course is plotted. We do know, though, that God is on the side of the "least of these" and that we can be the arms of God as we help to bend the arc of history towards justice. We must not lose hope.

    I have written my thoughts more thoroughly on my blog, if anyone is interested.

    Peace and blessings, and safe travel home,

    Jeff

    Comment by Jeff Martinhauk — June 22, 2006 @ 9:39 am

  2. I read alot (and been chastised alot) in the Episcopal blogosphere about the fact that we are called by Jesus to not despair in this situation; however, grief is not despair.

    Thank you for validating that grief is appropriate at this moment.

    Comment by Laine — June 22, 2006 @ 11:13 am

  3. Grief, Despair?
    Horror is more like it!
    IF you believe that you are called to take an action, and that call is of the Spirit, you don’t say “wait God, while I discuss it with the neighbors” Who are these leaders who voted to deny what they claimed in 2003 was a movement of the Spirit? What do they believe and what is the strength of their convictions? We know what is said about a lukewarm church, woe! My prediction is we will not be invited to Lambeth for tea! at least not Schori, she will not be accepted by the primates, Bishop Robinson will not be invited, Griswold will most likely be invited, along with Duncan et al. But in the meantime our leaders have sold the chance to proclaim the loving Christ to all, for a pot of beans.

    Comment by Bruno — June 22, 2006 @ 4:49 pm

  4. Louise,
    Thank you! You have given me my only smile in two days with +Harris’ remark. Thank you for the report from location; it fills in a lot. But mostly, thank you for all that you and Susan and all the other corageous workers have done. My heart goes out to you all.

    For my part, I am stunned and find all the blogtalk out there about looking at the bright side and bravely soldiering on to be a bit too much. Right now I am closer to the feeling of Emily Dickinson:

    “After great pain, a formal feeling comes/The nerves sit ceremonious/The stiff heart questions – was it He that bore/And yesterday – or centuries before?…..

    We look forward to welcoming you and Susan back in our loving arms. We pray for your safe journey home.

    God’s peace,
    Jerry

    Comment by Jerry Mersky — June 22, 2006 @ 4:50 pm

  5. Bruno/Laine -

    What I have learned out of this is that my natural personality/ability to push through to the bright side needs to be tempered to allow others to grieve/mourn/whatever.

    But I do believe that we cannot on the one hand say that the Spirit lead us through the convention to consent to the election of Gene and on the other say "well, the Spirit wasn't at work here." We don't get to pick and choose- at least in my opinion. God is at work here, and how– well, we just don't know yet.

    I'm pretty amazed at the outrage, actually. We got much more out of this convention then I expected coming into it. I never expected that we would get failure on the moratorium on same-sex unions. I never expected the church would speak as strongly as it did when it rejected the first moratorium on gay episcopacy.  I never expected the church would pass a resolution to fight the Federal Marriage Amendment.  I never expected the church would stand so solidly and completely with us.  That they would be so confused with the last minute panic that Windsor forced onto them, that the ABC forced on them, doesn't bother me as much.  From reading the transcripts it sounds like it was a panicked morning, and they are only human, after all.

    And- I guess I have compassion for those consumed by fear, because I have been consumed by fear myself. It is hard to step out of that. I have a hard time judging anyone for not being able to do it. Even if they are judging me in the process.

    I think Jesus forgave those who persecuted him, and I think we are called to do the same. That's just the message I get from the Gospel, I guess. Not to just have compassion for the oppressed, but also for the oppressor.

    j

    Comment by Jeff — June 22, 2006 @ 5:02 pm

  6. Jeff…
    I respect you for your positive outlook on this process. I, too, have great compassion for those who are entrenched in fear; however, I am not grieving over BO33 as you attribute. Your comment seems to be more correctly directed at Bruno, alone, than I. I will attempt to engage you on your blog to discuss these matters.
    Respectfully.

    Comment by Laine — June 22, 2006 @ 8:04 pm

  7. jeff
    neither am I grieving B033 as it is, but as it was done. I have posted on my blog a more complete explanation.
    Christ peace
    Bruno

    Comment by Bruno — June 23, 2006 @ 6:57 am

  8. Bruno -

    I think I get that now. I also grieve how that was done, as I’ve said in my blog today.

    I’ve always seen the posts on Susan’s blog from Bruno and never put the name with the face that I exchange the peace with regularly!

    Peace and see you in church on Sunday,

    j

    Comment by Jeff — June 23, 2006 @ 7:27 am

  9. I posted some thoughts about this. Click my name. I don’t know if anyone will find them helpful, but it’s what I had to offer.

    Comment by Renee in Ohio — June 23, 2006 @ 9:03 pm

  10. All the hand-wringing over a non-binding “resolution”? Have no fear that this was done solely with the hope the Archbishop of Canterbury won’t expel ECUSA from the Communion or not invite ECUSA bishops to the next Lambeth Conference. It was a “wink-and a nod” with the understanding by the ABC and Presiding Bishop that it would never be enforced….much like when the PB signed the Primate Statement saying that the consecration of Gene Robinson would “tear at the very fabric of the Communion and undermine that which binds us together”….only to then get on a plane and fly to New Hampshire to officiate. It might be hypocritical and two-faced, but I’m sure he had a good reason.

    Comment by Daniel — June 26, 2006 @ 1:29 pm

  11. Well…what do you expect? I knew the whole time that you would not get what you wanted and if you did it would not last. Africa is too powerful and they have grown by leaps and bounds over the past century and are growing each day. I think the best idea for all of you is to start a church of your own or go somewhere else. You might be thinking you are making headway but Africa and the ABC will slap you down every time. They are not going to appease a small interest group when they have 80 million others to take care of. I am not being ugly but I think your energies could be more productive at another denomination.

    Comment by dave — June 26, 2006 @ 9:55 pm

  12. Pingback by Anonymous — June 27, 2006 @ 10:51 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress.com